by Shelly Leachman, UC Santa Barbara

Jul. 23, 2013 (TSR) – Beach grooming and rising sea levels are putting two types of small beach creatures at risk of localized extinction in southern California.

As indicator species for beach biodiversity at large, the disappearance of the sand-loving isopods suggests a looming threat to similar sand-dwelling animals across the state and around the world.

The tiny Alloniscus, a beach version of the roly-poly, has disappeared from 64 percent of beaches where it was first recorded 100 years ago. "If they lived in coastal wetlands these isopods would be protected by the recognition that wetlands now have as valuable ecosystems. But as species on beaches they're not protected at all," says Jenifer Dugan. (Credit: David Hubbard/UC Santa Barbara/thesantosrepublic.com)
The tiny Alloniscus, a beach version of the roly-poly, has disappeared from 64 percent of beaches where it was first recorded 100 years ago. “If they lived in coastal wetlands these isopods would be protected by the recognition that wetlands now have as valuable ecosystems. But as species on beaches they’re not protected at all,” says Jenifer Dugan. (Credit: David Hubbard/UC Santa Barbara/thesantosrepublic.com)

Led by David Hubbard and Jenifer Dugan of University of California, Santa Barbara’s Marine Science Institute, the new work reveals a trend toward extirpation that has been growing slowly since 1905, steadily since the 1970?s, and today reflects the “dramatic” impact of development, climate change, and sea level rise on the diminutive critters that are essential prey for shorebirds.

From Point Conception in Santa Barbara County, to Baja at the state’s southern tip, the endemic isopods in question have vanished from some 60 percent of beaches where they were recorded 100 years ago. Barring the quick implementation of effective conservation strategies for sandy beaches, the researchers say, the isopods—and several other species—may be wiped out altogether.

“The pattern is really strong, and it’s a lot larger than we expected,” says research scientist Dugan, co-author of the paper available in the online edition of Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science.

“The southern species has lost eight percent of its California range since 1971—there are only a few places where you can find it on the mainland coast now. The northern species isn’t doing well in the southern California region either. Just a handful of populations still remain south of Ventura County.”

By mining historical data and conducting modern surveys at beaches where the species were reported in the past, Hubbard and Dugan assembled something of a biography of the critters whose formal names are Alloniscus perconvexus and Tylos punctatus.

Their research spans more than a century, dating back to a 1905 Smithsonian monograph on isopods that includes a section on Santa Barbara. But the bulk of earlier data came from surveys conducted in the 1970s, which were inspired by the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill that affected a section of coast where both species today are flourishing.

(Credit: David Hubbard/UC Santa Barbara/thesantosrepublic.com)
(Credit: David Hubbard/UC Santa Barbara/thesantosrepublic.com)

Catch-22

The nocturnal creatures, whose tell-tale burrows were once a familiar site to beachgoers, are caught in an ecological catch-22. The beaches where they are currently thriving—mostly on ungroomed, undeveloped coastlines—are also those where they face the greatest threat from sea level rise. Such “natural” beaches, Dugan explains, are often also bluff-backed, leaving the slow, vulnerable critters with no place to go as sea level rises.

“Looking into the future is a little bit daunting,” says Hubbard. “We have trouble coming up with more than 12 kilometers out of the more than 450 in the study where we have much certainty—with current sea level rise projections—that in 100 years biodiversity will be preserved unless active conservation strategies are adopted.”

Towel-friendly zones

“Of all the zones on a beach, the upper intertidal zone of beaches is the most likely to have a house or a parking lot on it, to be groomed, or to be covered with a sea wall—so our findings are a signal for this entire ecological zone,” adds Dugan. “These isopods are the proverbial canaries for upper beach macroinvertebrates and a whole suite of species that depend on the upper beach.”

“Snowy plovers are another indicator of losses of this zone, and California grunion require upper beach zones that stay dry between spring tides to successfully incubate their eggs.”

And therein lies the larger problem: a lack of widespread recognition of sandy beaches as ecosystems in their own right. Where the average sunbather may see only beauty—wide, flat swaths of sand—the scientists see peril for plant and animal life alike.

The grooming process to make a beach towel-friendly, so to speak, can be disastrous for species like Alloniscus and Tylos. Ceasing that practice alone, argue Hubbard and Dugan, would do wonders to restore the beaches that may be those best equipped to sustain biodiversity through sea level rise.

“There are opportunities for restoration, and that’s one of the messages we’re interested in people understanding,” Hubbard says. “These wide groomed beaches could become places where endemic biodiversity could be conserved and preserved through sea level rise. Some beaches with virtually no animals on them now would be tremendous restoration sites, but it will require a mind shift.”

“People think if we still have sand, the beach is ok, but that’s not the case,” Dugan adds. “Beaches are often treated as something other than a coastal ecosystem—they’re viewed primarily as recreational venues and economic drivers. Those are very important features, but the back story is that beaches are not yet appreciated as ecosystems that support endemic animals, processes and functions.

“If they lived in coastal wetlands these isopods would be protected by the recognition that wetlands now have as valuable ecosystems. But as species on beaches they’re not protected at all. We need a sea change in how we think about beaches.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here