"Doctors caring for children and teens have a professional obligation to always protect the best interests of the child, to protect vulnerable populations, and to prevent the misuse of medication," says lead author William Graf. (Credit: Ben Francis/Flickr)

by Karen N. Peart, Yale University

March 16, 2013 (TSR) – Prescribing ADHD drugs for children without attention issues is “not justifiable,” say doctors in a new statement.

Doctors have called upon their fellow physicians to limit or end the practice of prescribing memory-enhancing drugs to healthy children whose brains are still developing.

The position statement issued by doctors at Yale University’s School of Medicine and the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) is published in the journal Neurology.

"Doctors caring for children and teens have a professional obligation to always protect the best interests of the child, to protect vulnerable populations, and to prevent the misuse of medication," says lead author William Graf. (Credit: Ben Francis/Flickr)
“Doctors caring for children and teens have a professional obligation to always protect the best interests of the child, to protect vulnerable populations, and to prevent the misuse of medication,” says lead author William Graf. (Credit: Ben Francis/Flickr)

The statement was written to address the growing trend in which teens use “study drugs” before tests and parents request attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) drugs for children who don’t meet the criteria for the disorder. The AAN spent several years analyzing all of the available research and ethical issues to develop this official position statement on the topic.

“Doctors caring for children and teens have a professional obligation to always protect the best interests of the child, to protect vulnerable populations, and to prevent the misuse of medication,” says first author of the statement, William Graf, professor of pediatrics and neurology at Yale School of Medicine.

“The practice of prescribing these drugs, called neuro-enhancements, for healthy students is not justifiable.”

Graf and a group of child neurologists provide evidence that points to dozens of ethical, legal, social, and developmental reasons why prescribing mind-enhancing drugs, such as those used to treat ADHD, for healthy people is viewed differently in children and adolescents than it would be in functional, independent adults with full decision-making capacities.

Some of the reasons not to prescribe neuro-enhancements include:

  • the child’s best interest,
  • the long-term health and safety of neuro-enhancements, which has not been studied in children,
  • kids and teens may lack complete decision-making capacities while their judgments and cognitive abilities are still developing,
  • maintaining doctor-patient trust,
  • the risks of over-medication and dependency.

“A physician should talk to the child about the request, as it may reflect other medical, social, or psychological motivations such as anxiety, depression, or insomnia,” says Graf, who notes that there are alternatives to neuro-enhancements available, including maintaining good sleep, nutrition, study habits, and exercise regimens.

Source: DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318289703b

Read the original study here

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here