10
March , 2010
Wednesday

The Santos Republic

Premier 21st Century World Pundits

Full text of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke's Stamp Lecture, The Crisis and the ...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vej_KcSvPuc&feature=channel_page[/youtube]
The following is a full transcript of United States President Barack Obama's interview with al-Arabiya ...
  A CEASEFIRE WILL ONLY EMBOLDEN TERRORISTS AND PREVENT THE EMERGENCE OF A DEMOCRATIC MIDDLE EAST   Recent ...
Good evening. Before I take your questions tonight, I'd like to speak briefly about the ...
In recent weeks, many media conservatives have launched attacks on President Obama, claiming, for instance, ...
  Statement of the Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee on  An Open Letter to President-Elect Obama December 8, 2008  In ...
  Trade between the United States and its two closest neighbors has accelerated under NAFTA. But ...
For the better part of four centuries, explorers prowled the seas of North America, hunting ...
It was Election Night in early November, but for me the springtime sun was shining ...
Rod Beckström, the Department of Homeland Security's controversial cyber-security chief, has suddenly resigned amid allegations ...

Archive for the ‘Commentaries’ Category

The Phony War

Posted by Alex Calvo On February - 17 - 2009 2 COMMENTS

This is the name given to the first few months of the Second World War in the Western Front, when France and Britain, which had reluctantly declared war on Germany, failed to attack while the Wehrmacht was busy in Poland. The Royal Navy, under the able leadership of Winston Churchill, was of course an exception and understood from day one that, in General MacArthur´s words, in war there is no substitute for victory. Although the circumstances might be almost completely different, such a period of time comes to mind when looking in retrospect at the last few weeks in Gaza, where the Israeli Defense Forces undertook an operation whose objectives do not seem to have been clearly set out.

Alex Calvo

Briefly, the situation in Gaza prior to Operation Cast Lead was: 

– An economy completely dominated by foreign aid, unconditionally provided by democratic countries, for the most part.

–A not-too-high standard of living, high enough however to sustain a very high birth rate and to prevent the population from having to concentrate on productive work in order to feed themselves.

–A ruling regime bent on destroying Israel, as made clear on multiple occasions.

–An asymmetrical conflict in which rockets were constantly being launched at Israel without this prompting a military response from the IDF.

–A permeable border with Egypt, traversed by multiple tunnels, employed to supply Hamas with weapons and munitions.

     

    But above all, the situation was marked by an obsession with “negotiating” with “Palestinians”, both Hamas and Fatah, in the vain hope that a deal might be achieved and peace finally secured.  

    Is peace possible in the Middle East? Of course it is, however the road leading to it does not go through endless negotiations and does not depend on Israel being more generous here or there. Peace in the Middle East will only come when the Palestinians have been defeated. 

    One might be tempted to believe they have, and of course they have gone from defeat to defeat in the battlefield, but it is not such battles that define who wins and who loses a war. After all the Viet Cong suffered horrendous losses in their ill-fated Tet offensive … and went on to win the war.  

    Defeat is the loss of the will to fight on, once it has been made clear that further belligerence will only result in meaningless loss of life and bring one not an inch nearer one’s objectives. According to this definition, the Palestinians have not been defeated. 

    They have not been defeated because they still believe that by prolonging their half-a-century campaign against Israel, a democratic state which has never allowed its military a free hand in dealing with its enemies, they will destroy its will to resist and end up succumbing to a second Holocaust. They have not been defeated because they still think that Israel’s friends, the community of democratic nations, will desert it in order to appease Jihadists and hope to be eaten last by the crocodile.  And they have not been defeated because they are being fed by a wide assortment of NGOs, international agencies, and governments, who have turned Gaza into a large-scale welfare state experiment.  

    Welfare destroys the human soul and the work ethic, which set apart free men from slaves. Welfare allows families to send their sons into battle, knowing that they won’t miss the fruit of their labor. Welfare lets young men spend all their days plotting the destruction of their democratic neighbor. 

    Has Israel’s foray into Gaza changed any of this? Unfortunately not. Of course, some hundreds of terrorists have been killed, which is a cause for celebration, but governments, international organizations, and NGOs are already queuing up to “reconstruct” Gaza. There is nothing which leads us to believe that Hamas will suddenly decide to recognize Israel’s right to exist. 

    When a country decides to go to war, the gloves must be taken off. Otherwise the ensuing stalemate will only result in prolonged indecision and the need to, after a short period of time, take once again the same steps.  It is precisely this which has taken place in Gaza, where Israelis have not played to win. 

    It is therefore time to start looking at other options.

    ********

    Alex Calvo is TSR´s International Security and Defense Editor.

    A law graduate of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies, Alex spent some time travelling in Asia before embarking on a career in banking. His duties gradually shifted to international law, while his strong interest in international relations made him spend an increasing amount of time studying the subject and following current events. Three years ago, he finally decided to start working for himself as legal consultant an embark on a PhD in strategic studies. A professor at European University’s Barcelona campus, he is spending a semester at the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s Academy in Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan), and holds a commission as reserve officer.

    Alex’s main area of interest is Asia, including Central, South, and East-Asia. He is also a keen student of military history and doctrine, with an emphasis on counter-insurgency operations.

    Popularity: 71% [?]

    THE VIEW FROM DOWN UNDER

    Posted by AlChristian Cosca Villaruz On January - 25 - 2009 1 COMMENT

    alchristian-cosca-villaruz

    It was Election Night in early November, but for me the springtime sun was shining brightly outside. It’s still disconcerting for me to be going to the beach in mid January without having to hop on a plane to Florida or the Caribbean. But such is the life of an American expatriate in the Land Down Under, where I find myself having to allow for a 14-16 hour time difference whenever I call family and friends back in “America the Beautiful”.  

    I was working a shift in the Emergency Room as John McCain conceded defeat. As I recall, it was already early afternoon Sydney time.  

    Congratulations! We won!” my effusive, grinning co-worker said to me as I was standing there at the X-ray viewer, trying to interpret a chest film.  

    Congratulations for what?” I replied, irritated at having my train of thought broken. “What are you talking about?”  

    The ecstasy on my co-worker’s face melted away and devolved into something akin to puzzlement and total mystification, and she looked at me as if I had a third eye, or was born without a belly-button, or something else along those lines. “You don’t know? WE won! Obama won!” she said, seeking signs of affirmation in my countenance.  

    They were not particularly forthcoming. “Oh, I’m sorry”, I replied in a manner that was not offensive, but was not really apologetic at all. “I voted for McCain”, I added firmly.  

    At this point, the expression on my co-workers face turned once again, but this time, to one of embarrassment, as if she had somehow overstepped her bounds. What followed as a pregnant, uncomfortable silence, which ultimately went unbroken as she turned and walked meekly away, with the demeanor of someone who had just had her lunch eaten by a bully. At the time, I was reminded, of all things, of the film “Forrest Gump”. To paraphrase a line from that film – “I’m sorry I spoiled your little Barack Obama party.”  

    This encounter, with small variations, replayed itself several times over the next few days. Overjoyed Aussie Obamites congratulated what they thought was yet another Yank expatriate who had come to Australia to escape the Dark Age of an America ruled by Conservatives for much of the last eight years.  

    The collective Aussie ecstasy over the advent of Barack Obama is completely understandable, given the “rock star” treatment he was given here in the Land Down Under by the media – which of course, was overwhelmingly pro-Barack. The Australian press followed the campaign with a rigor that really took me by surprise. I was floored by the amount of interest there was in another sovereign nation’s political affairs, and in general, by the amount of airtime devoted to the United States on the nightly TV news, regardless of the election. By comparison, how much does your average American care about what’s going on in Canada or Mexico?  

    Nevertheless, the pro-Obama orientation of the Australian media was plainly obvious. The preponderance of air-time was devoted to the Obama camp, while the McCain campaign was treated as a kind of annoying postscript – a necessary afterthought hastily added at the end of the news segment, if only to maintain some semblance of objectivity and, hence, good journalism.  

    Australian news segments devoted to Obama looked like they were produced by Spielberg himself. There was Obama, at some packed, outdoor political rally, beautiful fall foliage in the backdrop, with crowd shots carefully selected to show the multiracial diversity of the crowd. Then there was Obama himself – jaunty, confidently strutting up to the podium, with that perfect smile on his photogenic face – the very flower of youth and vigor. Segments depicting McCain were very different – always filmed in dark, indoor settings, with crowd shots showing an all-white, staid (Middle American?) audience – sequences that accentuated Mac’s semi-shuffling gait, the fact that Cindy McCain towers over him, or that the movement in his left arm was limited, as if he were some kind of invalid. I remember thinking that the Australian media’s treatment of Senator McCain somehow reminded me of Emperor Palpatine from Star Wars. With coverage like this, it is no surprise that the Australian public came to perceive McCain as old, worn, infirm, weak, and out of touch. Too bad that they could not see that Mac’s bum left arm was not really a sign of infirmity at all, but instead, a badge of honor. A badge of honor earned by enduring, honorably and courageously, as a POW in some of the most freakish and horrible of circumstances imaginable.  

    So, with this Princess Diana-esque media treatment, how could the Aussie public not come to adore Barack Hussein Obama, and come to expect the very best from an Obama Presidency that promised “Change” and “Hope” (and, let’s not forget, “Sharing the Wealth”), aphorisms of a New Golden Age for the United States and the rest of the world? As an American who loves his country and only wants the best for it, I can only hope that these sentiments turn out to be real core values for Mr. Obama and his appointees, not just punchlines delivered at the denouement of a political rally.  

    Unfortunately, in my mind at least, all of this hype and adulation has resulted to a certain extent in an obscuration of the facts, blinding many of us to the real issues. Any cursory review of human history will show that it is rife with instances in which style has triumphed over substance, often with disastrous consequences. The same co-worker I mentioned at the beginning of this piece approached me again a few days later to flat out ask me why I didn’t vote for Obama. Apparently, the whole episode had been preoccupying her. As we were talking, I noted that she was wearing a Rosary bracelet – which to Catholics is a devotion to the Virgin Mary. “So, you’re Catholic I take it?” She replied in the affirmative. “So,” I said, “did you know that Senator Obama has one of the most radically pro-abortion voting records in Congress? And that he supports initiatives that limit funding to Catholic hospitals because they are Pro-Life?” A stunned silence ensured once again. Her mouth was agape. So much for her Obamessiah.  

    So, how do Aussies feel about the upcoming inauguration? From my own personal perceptions, and interactions with others – talking to my Aussie friends and sometimes, my patients – I have come to the conclusion that the feelings and expectations of the different segments of Australian society largely mirror the deep divisions within the United States. I have a varied group of Aussie “Mates” – running the gamut from physicians and attorneys, to independently wealthy landowners, to small business owners and software engineers, to the guy who cleans the blood and urine off the ER floors. Also, as an Emergency Physician, I am guaranteed an almost daily exposure to the parade of humanity that comes in and out of the ER doors. Upon hearing my “Yank” accent, many of my patients are only happy to share with me their thoughts and opinions about what is going on in “The States” – and refreshingly, I am glad to report that Aussie notions of political correctness are not as highly developed or “nuanced” as ours.  

    Those Aussies who work in high-powered, executive level jobs, occupying corner offices in the gleaming office buildings of downtown Sydney with million-dollar views of the Harbor Bridge and the Opera House, have embraced Senator Obama and his slogans of “Change” and “Hope”. They indeed are hungry for “Change” – anything to lift the global economic morass and restore the easy flow of money and big salaries. Let’s hope, then, that these people, who go home to their exclusive gated communities on the beaches north of Sydney, will also be willing to embrace the blood, sweat and tears that will be required to bring about this new Era of Global Harmony – with low carbon emissions, of course. Politics can indeed make strange bedfellows, and interestingly, the Obamania of the monied, educated, largely white socioeconomic stratum is matched only in Australia by the enthusiasm of the burgeoning Islamic population here – who, like the rest of the Islamic world, are happily anticipating the prospect of a more sympathetic resident at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The guy’s middle is Hussein, correct?  

    My fellow physicians, being the idealistic lot they are, have surprised me with their level of ambivalence regarding Mr. Obama. I was wrong to initially tag them as Obamites. From my conversations with my colleagues, they are aware of Obama’s plans to create a universal healthcare system – and I think that their own misgivings stem from looking at their own failing National Health Care System, which is beset by cost overruns, corruption, poor quality, and inefficiency.  

    For the nurses, paramedics, police officers and those patients of mine who largely originate from the blue collar, rough-and-tumble Western Sydney suburbs where I work (the part of Sydney you don’t see in the travel brochures), the view of Senator Obama’s Presidency is different yet again. From the working class, for whom real physical exertion is required to put food on the table – often living hand to mouth in the current hardscrabble economic climate – the sentiments regarding the then-upcoming Inauguration were certainly more measured, cautious, and pragmatic ones. With these folks, there is no evidence of any airy, unbridled optimism or naïve, youthful positivity. Their views are much more sober. From what William Davis Hanson calls “the muscled classes”, I tend to hear comments along the lines of “I figure Obama is kind of weak…he doesn’t look like he has any backbone” and “What has he really done to deserve being President?” I’ve also heard a lot of comments like “I reckon McCain deserved it because he served his country”. Whether this is the sage wisdom of the working man, only time will tell.  

    Once again, I can only report that Australian sentiments regarding the Presidency of Barack Obama are as widely divergent, and I daresay, divisive, as those present in my own beloved America. What else can we expect? I remember that the events of last autumn split my own family right down the middle in terms of whom we voted for. The people in the Land Down Under are almost as deeply divided as those back home. We cannot deny, based on voting demographics, that the general feeling in places like New York City and San Francisco will be very different from that in small towns like Whiting, Indiana, and Hamilton, Montana…small towns where Old Glory flies in front of every home, and words like Duty, Honor, Patriotism and God don’t make people blush. As an American who loves and misses my country, I can only hope that our differences somehow become a source of strength, instead of further weakening our great nation.

    “E Pluribus Unum”, anyone?


    *****

    AlChristian Cosca Villaruz is TSR´s Contributor from Australia.

    Popularity: 6% [?]

    Recent Comments

    There is something about me..

    Recent Comments

    The Policy Response

    On Jan-13-2009
    Reported by TSR Team

    Open Letter to Obama on Economy

    On Jan-23-2009
    Reported by TSR Team

    The Higher the Climb, the Bigger the Fall

    On Feb-18-2009
    Reported by Jennifer Lahl

    U.K. Government Takes 65% Lloyds Stake

    On Mar-7-2009
    Reported by MJ Santos

    Germany’s Stimulus…

    On Jan-5-2009
    Reported by MJ Santos

    Why The Government Should Get Out Of Banking

    On Jan-22-2009
    Reported by TSR Team