Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

China opposes Iran-based “Ridiculous, Counterproductive” US sanctions on CNPC’s Bank of Kunlun

August 1, 2012 (TSR) - The U.S. sanctions imposed on China’s Bank of Kunlun, accused of providing financial services to Iranian banks, are ridiculous and counterproductive, and risk hurting the normal economic links between Beijing and Washington.

The U.S. government said Tuesday that the Bank of Kunlun would be denied access to the U.S. financial system, alleging it has facilitated transactions with Iranian banks that were blacklisted by Washington for their alleged involvement in developing mass destruction weapons.

The latest round of penalties came as Western countries have blamed Iran for trying to develop nuclear weapons, an accusation strongly denied by Tehran.

However, the new measure, purportedly designed to curb Iran’s nuclear program, in fact lacks legal grounds and violates the norms of international relations, as sanctions on the Chinese bank and international transactions were made pursuant to the U.S. domestic laws.

As a matter of fact, bilateral economic activities between Kunlun and the six Iranian banks were conducted in line with a string of UN Security Council resolutions and other international standards.

Moreover, the legitimate cooperation between China and Iran in the areas of energy, economy and trade featured by openness and transparency has nothing to do with Tehran’s nuclear program and will by no means harm the interests of any third party.

Rather it is the U.S. practice of attempting to extending its domestic law to other countries that would obviously undermine China’s interests and bilateral ties as well.

The fourth round of the China-U.S. Strategic and Economic Dialogue held in Beijing in May has yielded positive results and set the tone for expanding strategic cooperation and promoting mutually beneficial relations.

However, Washington’s sanctions on the Chinese bank would lead to nothing but an hindrance to bilateral cooperation.

Furthermore, history has proved that the West’s practice of pressuring Iran through sanctions has come to no avail and will only add to the tensions between the two sides.

China has always attached great importance to the issue of nuclear security and firmly opposed nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism, and is ready to work with other relevant parties including the United States to push for a proper settlement of Iran’s nuclear issue.

Thus, it’s highly advisable for the United States to revoke the sanctions on Kunlun as soon as possible. And Washington should take concrete measures to enhance mutual trust and bridge differences with Tehran in the quest for a solution to the decade-long Iranian nuclear crisis.

China has announced its opposition to US sanctions imposed on the Bank of Kunlun, owned by China National Petroleum Corp, for doing business with Iranian banks.

In a statement on the website of the Chinese consulate in New York on Wednesday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang urged the US to immediately revoke the sanctions and stop implementing measures that will hurt China-US relations.

“The Chinese side expresses its strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition, and will take the matter up with the US in Beijing and Washington.”

The US Treasury Department on Tuesday imposed sanctions on the Bank of Kunlun and Elaf Islamic Bank in Iraq “for knowingly facilitating significant transactions or providing significant financial services to Iranian banks designated for their connection to Iran’s support for terrorism or proliferation.”

The move came on top of new US sanctions imposed by President Barack Obama on Iran, designed to deter Tehran and other countries from establishing payment mechanisms for the purchase of Iranian crude that circumvent existing sanctions.

The Bank of Kunlun is a regional bank in western Xinjiang province. It is 82% held by CNPC while other Xinjiang entities own the remainder.

When contacted Wednesday, a spokesman at CNPC said he was unaware of the matter and declined further comment. There was no response to an email query to the bank sent Wednesday.

In its 2011 annual report, the bank said its overall strategy is to serve China’s energy security needs and contribute to the country’s western development. Its business is underpinned largely by petroleum in Xinjiang and it serves mainly state-owned and other oil and petrochemical enterprises.

Its cross-border transactions totaled over $60 billion last year.

Qin added in the statement that China and Iran have normal bilateral relations, and have carried out open and transparent business cooperation in energy and trade that had nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program.

Despite receiving an exemption from US sanctions in late June for having significantly reduced its buying from Iran, China’s actual imports of Iranian crude oil during the month were near year-ago levels, at over 630,000 b/d, customs data showed July 24.

All of China’s crude buying is undertaken by CNPC rival Sinopec, and state trader Zhuhai Zhenrong. CNPC was reported to have pulled out of the $5 billion South Pars project in Iran after dragging its feet on development work despite several ultimatums, the semi-official Mehr news agency said July 29.

“[China's trade with Iran] does not violate any United Nations’ Security Council resolutions and other international guidelines. China’s position on non-proliferation is consistent and clear and together with relevant parties, including the US, will actively work to promote a resolution to the Iranian nuclear issue,” Qin said.

“But the US has ignored China’s concerns and has again imposed sanctions on Chinese businesses and banks. This will negatively impact US-China bilateral cooperation,” the statement added.

Source: Xinhua

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>